You're not losing people because your product isn't good enough. You're losing them because your system was never designed to make them stay, contribute, and recruit others. This assessment scores you across the five engines that determine whether an audience compounds — or quietly disappears.
Built for CMOs, CDOs, and brand leaders at organizations with real audiences and real retention problems.
Organizations with high Participation Quotients consistently outperform their categories on the metrics that actually matter — retention, lifetime value, organic growth, and customer acquisition cost.
That's because high-PQ organizations don't pay for all their growth. Their community does a meaningful share of it for them.
The gap between a PQ of 40 and a PQ of 75 isn't a gap in marketing sophistication. It's a gap in participation architecture — and it's fixable.
Engagement is passive. Participation is active. Most brands optimize the wrong one.
Built from 20 years of designing participation systems across gaming, AR, mobile, and real-world activations for organizations from Marvel to the Olympic Games.
Each stage maps to a pattern of participation health. Most leaders who take this already know which one fits. The score tells you exactly why — and what to do next.
As seen in Forbes · Wired · Wall Street Journal · TechCrunch · Los Angeles Times
15 questions. A Participation Quotient™ across five engines. Your stage, your bottleneck, and three prioritized actions — specific to your situation.
Complimentary Participation Systems Review available for selected organizations.
This shapes how your results are framed. The framework and scoring stay identical — the language becomes specific to your context.
Enter your details below. I'll send your full Participation Quotient™ report — your score, engine breakdown, bottleneck, and three prioritized actions for your specific situation.
No spam. Your information is used to personalize your results and follow-up — nothing else.